MSTBX vs. GPICX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MSTBX (Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund) and GPICX (GuidepathConservative Income Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTBX returned 2.36%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for GPICX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTBX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GPICX.

Performance

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTBX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 1.10% return.

MSTBX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.36%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: —

GPICX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 3.32%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 2.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MSTBX Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund	-0.11%	5.19%	4.52%	7.16%	-4.73%	0.84%	4.75%	3.53%	0.39%
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund	1.10%	3.49%	4.73%	4.87%	-1.67%	0.08%	-0.23%	2.30%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTBX and GPICX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018	0.38

The correlation between MSTBX and GPICX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSTBX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTBX

MSTBX Risk / Return Rank: 28
MSTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MSTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MSTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MSTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MSTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

GPICX

GPICX Risk / Return Rank: 99
GPICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
GPICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GPICX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GPICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GPICX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTBX	GPICX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	4.20	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	8.17	-6.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	3.02	-1.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	13.45	-11.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	69.81	-64.26

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the GPICX Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTBX and GPICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTBX drawdown since its inception was -6.31%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTBX and GPICX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTBX	GPICX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-3.10%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.41%	-0.25%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.42%	-0.52%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.31%	-2.79%	-3.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	0.00%	-0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-0.56%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	0.05%	+0.48%

Volatility

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison

Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund (MSTBX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.19%. This indicates that MSTBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTBX	GPICX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.19%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.47%	0.61%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16%	0.79%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.39%	1.10%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.09%	1.06%	+1.03%

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTBX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTBX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison

MSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than GPICX's 3.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund	3.80%	3.86%	4.53%	4.23%	1.51%	0.48%	0.57%	1.67%	1.30%
MSTBX Morningstar Defensive Bond Fund	2.45%	2.79%	4.23%	3.80%	2.64%	2.64%	3.17%	2.69%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTBX and GPICX in my portfolio?

MSTBX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTBX or GPICX?

MSTBX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to GPICX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTBX dropped -6.31% vs GPICX's -3.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.