MSST vs. OMAH
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
MSST vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -20.98% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.24% return.
MSST
- 1D
- -7.10%
- 1M
- -34.34%
- YTD
- -20.98%
- 6M
- -31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSST vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -20.98% | -22.94% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.24% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and OMAH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
OMAH
MSST vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSST | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 0.74 | -1.57 |
Drawdowns
MSST vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -44.05%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.05% | -11.83% | -32.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.11% | -2.02% | -37.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -1.26% | -20.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.68% | 8.06% | +64.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 13.18% | +59.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 13.18% | +59.50% |
MSST vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than OMAH's 15.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 17.99% | 2.71% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.34% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and OMAH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 15.34% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for MSST and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer