MSST vs. FTQI
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. MSST is actively managed, while FTQI is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
MSST vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 11.74% return.
MSST
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -33.85%
- YTD
- -33.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
MSST vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -33.85% | -24.58% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 11.74% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and FTQI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTQI
MSST vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSST | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSST vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -19.42% | -39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.11% | -0.63% | -49.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -3.74% | -21.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.61% | 10.73% | +64.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 14.83% | +60.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 13.28% | +62.33% |
MSST vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.05%, more than FTQI's 11.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 11.02% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 24.05% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and FTQI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 24.05%, compared with 11.02% for FTQI.
MSST is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.75% for FTQI.
Find the right allocation for MSST and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer