MSST vs. DOGG
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
MSST vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 9.86% return.
MSST
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -33.85%
- YTD
- -33.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSST vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -33.85% | -24.58% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 9.86% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and DOGG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOGG
MSST vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSST | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSST vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -11.19% | -47.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.11% | -3.43% | -46.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.55% | -3.26% | -22.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.61% | 10.86% | +64.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 12.99% | +62.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.61% | 12.99% | +62.62% |
MSST vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.05%, more than DOGG's 8.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.61% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 24.05% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and DOGG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 24.05%, compared with 8.61% for DOGG.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.75% for DOGG.
Find the right allocation for MSST and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer