PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSSMX vs. VISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A (MSSMX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSSMX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than VISGX's 13.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MSSMX has outperformed VISGX with an annualized return of 15.01%, while VISGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.62% annualized return.


MSSMX

1D
2.93%
1M
-4.22%
6M
7.61%
YTD
2.93%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
9.66%
5Y*
-8.92%
10Y*
15.01%
ALL TIME*
10.62%

VISGX

1D
2.23%
1M
-4.70%
6M
9.29%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
10.62%
ALL TIME*
9.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSSMX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A
2.93%0.76%29.15%54.22%-59.57%-4.29%149.49%77.58%-0.03%22.42%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
13.27%8.18%14.80%22.91%-28.50%5.58%35.11%32.60%-5.81%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MSSMX and VISGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 1998

0.89

The correlation between MSSMX and VISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSSMX vs. VISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSSMX
MSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

VISGX
VISGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A (MSSMX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSSMXVISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.17

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.76

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

5.98

-6.19

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSSMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the VISGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSSMX and VISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSSMX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than VISGX's maximum drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSMX and VISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSSMXVISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-58.74%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.92%

-11.39%

-21.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.92%

-27.58%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.12%

-38.41%

-32.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.24%

-38.70%

-37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.60%

-6.66%

-41.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

-11.56%

-13.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.49%

3.36%

+13.13%

Volatility

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A (MSSMX) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) at 5.23%. This indicates that MSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSSMXVISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

5.23%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

16.14%

+7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.29%

20.70%

+10.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.12%

23.74%

+14.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.42%

23.03%

+11.39%

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSSMX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VISGX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSSMX vs. VISGX - Dividend Comparison

MSSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSSMX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Inception Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%1.16%0.00%0.14%36.28%13.10%45.60%18.04%57.39%3.76%9.73%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.33%0.33%0.42%0.56%0.46%0.23%0.35%0.47%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSSMX and VISGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSSMX has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to VISGX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSMX dropped -76.24% vs VISGX's -58.74%.

VISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSSMX and VISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer