PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSSCX vs. SKSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSSCX achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than SKSEX's 17.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MSSCX has outperformed SKSEX with an annualized return of 16.27%, while SKSEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.17% annualized return.


MSSCX

1D
-1.82%
1M
3.19%
YTD
19.79%
6M
13.20%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
16.27%

SKSEX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
17.69%
6M
7.79%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
12.29%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSSCX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund
19.79%7.63%10.88%23.41%-21.47%16.33%39.13%46.03%2.22%21.23%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
17.69%-4.50%10.60%17.49%-15.36%33.22%3.30%38.26%-18.98%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MSSCX and SKSEX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 1997

0.84

The correlation between MSSCX and SKSEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSSCX vs. SKSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSSCX
MSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SKSEX
SKSEX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SKSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SKSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSSCXSKSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.19

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

6.11

+5.10

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the SKSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSSCX and SKSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSSCXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.22

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.27

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.38

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.60

-0.24

Drawdowns

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSSCX drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, which is greater than SKSEX's maximum drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSCX and SKSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSSCXSKSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.46%

-65.26%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.80%

-10.83%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.02%

-26.39%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.02%

-26.39%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.70%

-49.36%

+2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-2.15%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.21%

-9.23%

-18.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.87%

-0.34%

Volatility

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX) at 5.29%. This indicates that MSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSSCXSKSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

5.29%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.76%

15.69%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

19.54%

+5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

21.48%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.46%

24.50%

+1.96%

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SKSEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSSCX vs. SKSEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSSCX nor SKSEX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSSCX
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%9.23%1.14%0.00%43.52%3.34%17.24%59.21%27.92%0.43%28.21%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.62%1.51%1.69%13.94%43.15%13.91%14.98%6.75%0.02%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSSCX and SKSEX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSSCX has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to SKSEX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSSCX dropped -78.46% vs SKSEX's -65.26%.

MSSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSSCX and SKSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer