MSSCX vs. KSCOX
Compare and contrast key facts about AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) and Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX).
MSSCX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Sep 24, 1997. KSCOX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on Mar 20, 2000.
Performance
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund | -1.27% | 7.63% | 10.88% | 23.41% | -21.47% | 16.33% | 39.13% | 46.03% | 2.22% | 21.23% |
KSCOX Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 29.72% | -8.66% | 68.42% | -14.77% | 31.96% | 50.32% | 2.30% | 27.06% | 0.29% | 26.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSSCX achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than KSCOX's 29.72% return. Over the past 10 years, MSSCX has underperformed KSCOX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while KSCOX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.17% annualized return.
MSSCX
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -9.68%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
KSCOX
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 6M
- 22.71%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- 21.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than KSCOX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSSCX vs. KSCOX — Risk / Return Rank
MSSCX
KSCOX
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) and Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSSCX | KSCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.31 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.63 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.28 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 0.46 | +3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSSCX | KSCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.31 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.58 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.82 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.61 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSSCX and KSCOX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Dividend Comparison
MSSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KSCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSCX AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.23% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 43.52% | 3.34% | 17.24% | 59.21% | 27.92% | 0.43% | 28.21% |
KSCOX Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.14% | 0.18% | 3.58% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSSCX drawdown since its inception was -78.46%, which is greater than KSCOX's maximum drawdown of -70.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSSCX and KSCOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSSCX | KSCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.46% | -70.09% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -24.29% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.02% | -33.10% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.70% | -47.09% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.80% | -11.01% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | -14.89% | -13.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 14.84% | -10.22% |
Volatility
MSSCX vs. KSCOX - Volatility Comparison
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Fund (MSSCX) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX) at 7.94%. This indicates that MSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSSCX | KSCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 7.94% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 19.48% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.66% | 28.88% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.14% | 27.74% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.32% | 25.84% | +0.48% |