MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L
MSRG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)) and DGSE.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - MSRG.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while DGSE.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSRG.L returned 4.59%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for DGSE.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSRG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for DGSE.L.
Performance
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSRG.L achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly higher than DGSE.L's 10.45% return.
MSRG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- —
DGSE.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.03%
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSRG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) | 18.41% | 19.09% | 6.13% | -4.72% | -8.13% | -0.54% | 13.46% | 2.05% |
DGSE.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.45% | 7.78% | -0.93% | 9.14% | -4.67% | 11.05% | -0.71% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSRG.L and DGSE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MSRG.L and DGSE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Financial Services
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Consumer Cyclical
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Industrials
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Healthcare
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Consumer Defensive
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Communication Services
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Basic Materials
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Utilities
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Real Estate
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
Energy
MSRG.L
-
DGSE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSRG.L
DGSE.L
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF (DGSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSRG.L | DGSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 2.23 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 6.81 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSRG.L | DGSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 1.49 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.32 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSRG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.52%, smaller than the maximum DGSE.L drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSRG.L and DGSE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSRG.L | DGSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.52% | -35.43% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -8.87% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -18.85% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -18.85% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.96% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -7.71% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.91% | +0.21% |
Volatility
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF (DGSE.L) at 4.50%. This indicates that MSRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSRG.L | DGSE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 4.50% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 11.24% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 13.30% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 13.37% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 15.72% | +3.26% |
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSRG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DGSE.L's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSRG.L vs. DGSE.L - Dividend Comparison
MSRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGSE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGSE.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend UCITS ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
MSRG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSRG.L and DGSE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSRG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSRG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for DGSE.L.
MSRG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while DGSE.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MSRG.L and 0.54% for DGSE.L.
Find the right allocation for MSRG.L and DGSE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer