MSRG.L vs. 500U.L
MSRG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C)) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - MSRG.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSRG.L returned 4.59%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSRG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSRG.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSRG.L achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly higher than 500U.L's 10.84% return.
MSRG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 18.41%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 39.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- —
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.58%
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSRG.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) | 18.41% | 19.09% | 6.13% | -4.72% | -8.13% | -0.54% | 13.46% | 2.05% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.84% | 9.90% | 26.63% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 31.37% | 13.61% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSRG.L and 500U.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between MSRG.L and 500U.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSRG.L
500U.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
MSRG.L
500U.L
Financial Services
MSRG.L
500U.L
Consumer Cyclical
MSRG.L
500U.L
Industrials
MSRG.L
500U.L
Healthcare
MSRG.L
500U.L
Consumer Defensive
MSRG.L
500U.L
Communication Services
MSRG.L
500U.L
Basic Materials
MSRG.L
500U.L
Utilities
MSRG.L
500U.L
Real Estate
MSRG.L
500U.L
Energy
MSRG.L
-
500U.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSRG.L
500U.L
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSRG.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 4.06 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 13.65 | -0.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSRG.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.47 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.00 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.33 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSRG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.52%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSRG.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSRG.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.52% | -26.14% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.98% | -7.19% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.35% | -20.95% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -20.95% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.22% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -3.62% | -8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.15% | +0.97% |
Volatility
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets SRI PAB UCITS DR ETF (C) (MSRG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that MSRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSRG.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 3.58% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 8.66% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 11.91% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 15.26% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 18.56% | +0.42% |
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSRG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSRG.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSRG.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSRG.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MSRG.L.
MSRG.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. MSRG.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MSRG.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for MSRG.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer