MSILX vs. FAOSX
MSILX (iMGP International Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSILX returned 5.90%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MSILX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSILX
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 19.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.06%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -0.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSILX iMGP International Fund | 7.93% | 30.20% | -0.58% | 17.41% | -21.57% | 11.82% | 5.03% | 29.53% | -20.24% | 19.96% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSILX and FAOSX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSILX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSILX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
MSILX
FAOSX
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP International Fund (MSILX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSILX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.32 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | -0.48 | +5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSILX drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSILX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSILX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -36.24% | -24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -7.26% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -13.96% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.92% | -36.24% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -5.86% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -7.90% | -7.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.48% | -1.00% |
Volatility
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
iMGP International Fund (MSILX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSILX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 0.00% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 0.00% | +13.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 7.68% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 16.65% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 16.56% | +2.54% |
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSILX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSILX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
MSILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSILX iMGP International Fund | 1.44% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.01% | 0.88% | 3.70% | 2.23% | 2.99% | 0.74% | 2.94% | 4.15% | 1.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSILX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSILX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSILX dropped -60.45% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
MSILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSILX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer