PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSIGX vs. QVGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) and Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSIGX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than QVGIX's 7.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MSIGX has outperformed QVGIX with an annualized return of 12.06%, while QVGIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.01% annualized return.


MSIGX

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.11%
YTD
5.31%
6M
4.42%
1Y
17.85%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
12.06%

QVGIX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.14%
YTD
7.97%
6M
7.65%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
5.31%16.02%23.66%23.06%-20.21%27.37%14.41%22.49%-8.25%16.79%
QVGIX
Invesco Global Allocation Fund
7.97%13.68%5.63%15.63%-17.60%10.45%14.42%16.35%-9.74%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MSIGX and QVGIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.87

The correlation between MSIGX and QVGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSIGX vs. QVGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSIGX
MSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

QVGIX
QVGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QVGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QVGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) and Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSIGXQVGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.71

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

11.38

-3.60

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the QVGIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSIGX and QVGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSIGX drawdown since its inception was -57.22%, which is greater than QVGIX's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSIGX and QVGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSIGXQVGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.22%

-22.91%

-34.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-6.94%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-10.00%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-22.91%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

-22.91%

-12.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-0.99%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-4.24%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.58%

+1.02%

Volatility

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Invesco Global Allocation Fund (QVGIX) at 3.16%. This indicates that MSIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSIGXQVGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.16%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

7.84%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

9.44%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

10.86%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

10.97%

+6.97%

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSIGX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than QVGIX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSIGX vs. QVGIX - Dividend Comparison

MSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%, more than QVGIX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
7.12%7.50%6.06%7.40%4.68%19.19%3.17%0.89%19.62%7.50%2.96%13.79%
QVGIX
Invesco Global Allocation Fund
6.29%6.79%0.93%2.27%6.10%14.15%0.00%0.00%9.56%0.13%3.34%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSIGX and QVGIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSIGX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to QVGIX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSIGX dropped -57.22% vs QVGIX's -22.91%.

QVGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSIGX and QVGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer