MSFT vs. VHT
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 24.39%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VHT. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 24.39%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
MSFT vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and VHT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.50 |
The correlation between MSFT and VHT shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
VHT
MSFT vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.19 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.53 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 3.81 | -4.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -39.12% | -30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -10.40% | -23.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -16.91% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -17.71% | -19.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -28.85% | -8.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -3.28% | -24.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -5.99% | -15.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 4.19% | +12.29% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 4.88% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 10.46% | +11.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 14.70% | +10.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 15.01% | +11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 16.97% | +10.09% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and VHT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs VHT's -39.12%.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer