PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.75%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

LUNR

1D
-13.12%
1M
-25.39%
YTD
64.02%
6M
122.39%
1Y
144.44%
3Y*
42.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%-0.76%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.02%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and LUNR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT:

$2.91T

LUNR:

$3.94T

EPS

MSFT:

$16.79

LUNR:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

MSFT:

9.16

LUNR:

2.95K

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT:

$318.27B

LUNR:

$334.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT:

$217.41B

LUNR:

$85.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSFT:

$200.96B

LUNR:

-$96.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFTLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.26

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

3.47

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

7.12

-8.20

MSFT vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFTLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-97.43%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-41.94%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-78.54%

+44.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-67.53%

+40.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-63.21%

+41.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

20.37%

-3.89%

Volatility

MSFT vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.52%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFTLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

42.95%

-32.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

93.42%

-71.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

111.16%

-85.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

171.29%

-144.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

171.29%

-144.23%

Dividends

MSFT vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

MSFT vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corporation and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
82.89B
186.73M
(MSFT) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSFT vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corporation and Intuitive Machines Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
39.0%
Portfolio components
MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and LUNR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer