MSFT vs. FSELX
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) is Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, MSFT returned 23.86%/yr vs 39.23%/yr for FSELX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MSFT vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -20.19% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 80.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 23.86%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.23% annualized return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -16.56%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -20.19%
- 1Y
- -21.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- 23.86%
FSELX
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 80.55%
- 6M
- 80.55%
- 1Y
- 134.73%
- 3Y*
- 64.10%
- 5Y*
- 44.05%
- 10Y*
- 39.23%
MSFT vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -20.19% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 80.55% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 44.33% | 64.50% | -12.01% | 34.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and FSELX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1986 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and FSELX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
FSELX
MSFT vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.51 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 9.20 | -9.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 31.73 | -32.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -82.54% | +13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.50% | -14.38% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.50% | -36.31% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -46.37% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -46.37% | +9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.66% | -4.53% | -24.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -28.66% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.76% | 4.16% | +13.60% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 11.56%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 20.71%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 20.71% | -9.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 30.71% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.08% | 37.30% | -10.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 39.82% | -12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 35.48% | -8.32% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FSELX's 9.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 9.07% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.93% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and FSELX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSELX has higher volatility (20.71%) compared to MSFT (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer