MSFT vs. CEUG.L
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while CEUG.L (iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) is Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Over the past 5 years, MSFT returned 9.56%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for CEUG.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSFT is traded in USD, while CEUG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CEUG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than CEUG.L's 11.07% return.
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
CEUG.L
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 3.49% |
CEUG.L iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 11.07% | 36.42% | 8.96% | 26.81% | -20.06% | 21.79% | 2.81% | 31.14% | -15.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and CEUG.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2018 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MSFT and CEUG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. CEUG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
CEUG.L
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT | CEUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.22 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.75 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 6.31 | -7.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than CEUG.L's maximum drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and CEUG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | CEUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -44.98% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -11.86% | -22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -16.87% | -17.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -38.97% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | 0.00% | -27.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -8.03% | -13.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 3.29% | +13.19% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.L) at 4.97%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEUG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | CEUG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 4.97% | +5.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 13.73% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.42% | 17.02% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.66% | 20.65% | +6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 22.17% | +4.89% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. CEUG.L - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CEUG.L's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.L iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.81% | 2.73% | 2.84% | 1.81% | 1.77% | 3.05% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and CEUG.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and CEUG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer