PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 24.39%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.95% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.07%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

^NDX

1D
0.64%
1M
0.19%
YTD
17.37%
6M
17.62%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
25.76%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
17.37%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and ^NDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1986

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and ^NDX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFT^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.36

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

2.92

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

10.85

-11.93

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and ^NDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFT^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-82.90%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-12.12%

-21.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-22.93%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-35.56%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-35.56%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-3.34%

-24.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-24.61%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

3.26%

+13.22%

Volatility

MSFT vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 7.51%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFT^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

7.51%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

13.84%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

17.29%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

22.76%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

22.61%

+4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to ^NDX (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs ^NDX's -82.90%.

^NDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer