PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDD vs. NVDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSDD vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -49.24% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 24.36% return.


MSDD

1D
-3.94%
1M
84.54%
YTD
-49.24%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDL

1D
3.68%
1M
21.13%
YTD
24.36%
6M
26.69%
1Y
90.12%
3Y*
113.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and NVDL is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.33

MSDD vs. NVDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSDD
NVDL

Technology

200.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

MSDD
200.1%
NVDL
100.0%

Basic Materials

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Communication Services

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Energy

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Financial Services

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Healthcare

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Industrials

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Real Estate

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Utilities

MSDD

-

NVDL
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDD vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSDD vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSDDNVDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.80

-1.15

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, which is greater than NVDL's maximum drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and NVDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDDNVDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.91%

-67.55%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.95%

-15.19%

-53.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-16.96%

-12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.41%

Volatility

MSDD vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDDNVDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.35%

68.08%

+73.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.35%

90.39%

+50.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.35%

90.39%

+50.96%

MSDD vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSDD vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSDD nor NVDL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSDD and NVDL have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

MSDD and NVDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 1.05% for NVDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDD and NVDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer