PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDD vs. FEPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSDD vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -48.71% return, which is significantly lower than FEPI's 5.41% return.


MSDD

1D
0.06%
1M
94.14%
YTD
-48.71%
6M
-34.00%
1Y
82.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEPI

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
5.41%
6M
6.71%
1Y
25.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and FEPI is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.56

The correlation between MSDD and FEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSDD vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSDD
FEPI

Technology

200.1%
65.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MSDD
200.1%
FEPI
65.5%

Basic Materials

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Communication Services

MSDD

-

FEPI
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MSDD

-

FEPI
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Energy

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Financial Services

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Healthcare

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Industrials

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Real Estate

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Utilities

MSDD

-

FEPI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDD vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD
MSDD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FEPI
FEPI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSDDFEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.27

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.94

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

6.35

-4.43

MSDD vs. FEPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSDD Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FEPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSDD and FEPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and FEPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDDFEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.91%

-23.56%

-61.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.91%

-12.91%

-72.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.62%

-5.93%

-62.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-3.52%

-26.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.82%

3.93%

+37.89%

Volatility

MSDD vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) has a higher volatility of 36.79% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 5.83%. This indicates that MSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDDFEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

36.79%

5.83%

+30.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

126.32%

13.40%

+112.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.03%

17.08%

+123.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

140.48%

19.13%

+121.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.48%

19.13%

+121.35%

MSDD vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSDD vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison

MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
25.67%25.48%27.18%4.21%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSDD and FEPI have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDD has higher volatility (36.79%) compared to FEPI (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSDD dropped -84.91% vs FEPI's -23.56%.

On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 82.41% vs 25.81% for FEPI. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 5.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 82.41% return vs 25.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 25.67%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FEPI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 0.65% for FEPI.

FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDD and FEPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer