MSCOX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jul 7, 2026

MSCOX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. MSCOX is actively managed, while FGROX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSCOX returned -9.97%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for FGROX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSCOX charges 2.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCOX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 33.50% return.

MSCOX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.75%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 2.29%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: -9.97%
• 10Y*: —

FGROX

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 10.39%
• 6M: 29.29%
• YTD: 33.50%
• 1Y: 64.65%
• 3Y*: 30.59%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: 16.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSCOX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C	7.08%	0.00%	28.07%	52.94%	-59.90%	-5.01%	147.58%	35.22%	-0.81%	3.20%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	33.50%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCOX and FGROX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2017	0.78

The correlation between MSCOX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSCOX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCOX

MSCOX Risk / Return Rank: 4
MSCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MSCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSCOX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	2.54	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	3.19	-2.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.40	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	4.73	-4.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	19.69	-19.48

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCOX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCOX drawdown since its inception was -76.57%, which is greater than FGROX's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCOX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSCOX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.57%	-41.48%	-35.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.16%	-14.36%	-18.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.16%	-28.61%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.62%	-38.52%	-34.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.57%	-3.46%	-45.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.56%	-10.21%	-24.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	3.43%	+12.78%

Volatility

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C (MSCOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) have volatilities of 9.83% and 9.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSCOX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.83%	9.96%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.20%	20.58%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.71%	26.78%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.09%	25.91%	+12.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.49%	25.26%	+9.23%

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSCOX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSCOX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

MSCOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	8.53%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%	0.00%
MSCOX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Inception Portfolio Class C	0.00%	0.00%	0.61%	0.00%	0.15%	38.66%	13.71%	23.55%	18.35%	57.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSCOX and FGROX in my portfolio?

MSCOX and FGROX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSCOX or FGROX?

FGROX has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to MSCOX (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCOX dropped -76.57% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.