PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSBT vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSBT vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZBC

1D
-2.73%
1M
-18.42%
YTD
-25.36%
6M
-29.82%
1Y
-38.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBT vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSBT and EZBC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSBT vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSBT

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSBT vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSBT vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSBTEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.33

0.30

-1.63

Drawdowns

MSBT vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and EZBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSBTEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-49.37%

+29.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.25%

-48.04%

+27.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-16.01%

+12.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.42%

Volatility

MSBT vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSBTEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

43.67%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.92%

50.06%

-17.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.92%

50.06%

-17.14%

MSBT vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MSBT vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSBT nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MSBT and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.

MSBT and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.19% for EZBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSBT and EZBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer