MSBT vs. EZBC
MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
MSBT vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -25.36%
- 6M
- -29.82%
- 1Y
- -38.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -8.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSBT and EZBC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBT vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
MSBT
EZBC
MSBT vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSBT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.33 | 0.30 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
MSBT vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | -49.37% | +29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.25% | -48.04% | +27.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -16.01% | +12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.42% | — |
Volatility
MSBT vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBT | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | 43.67% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 50.06% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 50.06% | -17.14% |
MSBT vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MSBT vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSBT nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MSBT and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZBC.
MSBT and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for MSBT and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer