PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSBT vs. CBOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSBT vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSBT

1D
-2.70%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOL

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBT vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSBT and CBOL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSBT vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSBT vs. CBOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSBTCBOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.33

-1.80

+0.47

Drawdowns

MSBT vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and CBOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSBTCBOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-4.91%

-15.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.25%

-4.64%

-15.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-3.21%

-0.70%

Volatility

MSBT vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSBTCBOLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.92%

3.88%

+29.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.92%

3.88%

+29.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.92%

3.88%

+29.04%

MSBT vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSBT vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MSBT and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.

MSBT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.79% for CBOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSBT and CBOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer