MSBT vs. BLKC
MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - MSBT tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate while BLKC tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index. Both are passively managed. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BLKC.
Performance
MSBT vs. BLKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLKC
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT vs. BLKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBT vs. BLKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSBT | BLKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.33 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MSBT vs. BLKC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBT | BLKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.25% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | — | — |
Volatility
MSBT vs. BLKC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBT | BLKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.92% | — | — |
MSBT vs. BLKC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BLKC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSBT vs. BLKC - Dividend Comparison
MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF | 4.39% | 7.72% | 19.66% | 1.92% | 5.40% | 0.51% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BLKC.
BLKC has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
MSBT tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark 4PM NY Settlement Rate, while BLKC tracks Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity, Trusts and ETPs Index. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.60% for BLKC.
Find the right allocation for MSBT and BLKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer