PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAU.L achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPXS.L's 10.20% return.


MSAU.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-2.96%
6M
-1.63%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
-0.44%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

SPXS.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.05%
6M
9.96%
YTD
10.20%
1Y
-98.78%
3Y*
-74.11%
5Y*
-54.94%
10Y*
-27.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSAU.L
Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.13%-5.73%0.20%10.06%-5.65%36.12%0.47%6.13%-3.40%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.20%-98.82%25.56%27.00%-18.53%29.64%17.89%30.86%-8.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAU.L and SPXS.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAU.L
MSAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSAU.LSPXS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.52

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-1.00

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

-1.23

+1.90

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAU.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAU.L and SPXS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAU.LSPXS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-99.07%

+56.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-99.07%

+88.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-99.07%

+83.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.84%

-99.07%

+69.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.51%

-98.90%

+80.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-7.67%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

80.57%

-75.42%

Volatility

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) is 2.49%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that MSAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAU.LSPXS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.73%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

9.24%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

99.43%

-84.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

47.13%

-31.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

35.27%

-16.51%

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSAU.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAU.L nor SPXS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAU.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAU.L.

MSAU.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAU.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAU.L and SPXS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer