PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAU.L achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than LGUS.L's 10.34% return.


MSAU.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-2.96%
6M
-1.63%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
-0.44%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*

LGUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
9.90%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
21.64%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSAU.L
Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.13%-5.73%0.20%10.06%-5.65%36.12%0.47%6.13%1.74%
LGUS.L
L&G US Equity UCITS ETF
10.34%17.98%25.09%28.66%-20.46%27.91%21.16%30.91%-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAU.L and LGUS.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.38

The correlation between MSAU.L and LGUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF

L&G US Equity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAU.L
MSAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUS.L
LGUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSAU.LLGUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.32

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.59

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

9.99

-9.31

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the LGUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAU.L and LGUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than LGUS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAU.L and LGUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAU.LLGUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-34.26%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-8.58%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-19.46%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.84%

-25.64%

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.51%

-0.49%

-18.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-5.30%

-9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

2.23%

+2.92%

Volatility

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) is 2.49%, while L&G US Equity UCITS ETF (LGUS.L) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that MSAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAU.LLGUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.86%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

9.41%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.32%

12.47%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

16.51%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

18.10%

+0.66%

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSAU.L vs. LGUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAU.L nor LGUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAU.L and LGUS.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAU.L.

MSAU.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while LGUS.L tracks L&G US Equity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAU.L and 0.05% for LGUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAU.L and LGUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer