MSAU.L vs. G500.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

MSAU.L (Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF) and G500.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - MSAU.L tracks the Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF while G500.L tracks the Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSAU.L returned 2.06%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for G500.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSAU.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for G500.L.

Performance

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MSAU.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAU.L achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than G500.L's 10.60% return.

MSAU.L

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -2.96%
• 6M: -1.63%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 1Y: 3.11%
• 3Y*: -0.44%
• 5Y*: 2.06%
• 10Y*: —

G500.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 10.32%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSAU.L Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF	4.13%	-5.73%	0.20%	10.06%	-5.65%	36.12%	15.65%
G500.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)	10.60%	26.32%	22.89%	31.47%	-28.53%	27.78%	32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAU.L and G500.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020	0.36

The correlation between MSAU.L and G500.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSAU.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAU.L

MSAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MSAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MSAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MSAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
MSAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

G500.L

G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSAU.L	G500.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.53	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	2.30	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.27	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	1.82	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.67	6.85	-6.18

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAU.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than G500.L's maximum drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAU.L and G500.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSAU.L	G500.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.92%	-39.54%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.90%	-12.56%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.03%	-17.75%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.84%	-39.54%	+9.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.51%	-0.10%	-18.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.49%	-8.08%	-6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	3.34%	+1.81%

Volatility

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) is 2.49%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that MSAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSAU.L	G500.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	3.57%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	11.66%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	14.98%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	20.37%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	20.09%	-1.33%

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSAU.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAU.L nor G500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSAU.L and G500.L in my portfolio?

MSAU.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSAU.L or G500.L?

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSAU.L or G500.L?

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAU.L.

What is the main difference between MSAU.L and G500.L?

MSAU.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAU.L and 0.05% for G500.L.