PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAP.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSAP.L is traded in GBp, while VPAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VPAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAP.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than VPAC.L's 3.01% return.


MSAP.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-3.59%
6M
-2.38%
YTD
3.41%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
-1.62%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*

VPAC.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.51%
6M
2.59%
YTD
3.01%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MSAP.L
Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
3.41%-12.17%1.88%3.56%6.09%37.74%-2.87%2.76%-0.06%
VPAC.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD
3.01%-1.24%12.77%3.80%1.04%4.62%1.73%12.68%-2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAP.L and VPAC.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAP.L
MSAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MSAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VPAC.L
VPAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAP.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSAP.LVPAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.17

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

1.27

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

3.30

-2.80

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAP.L and VPAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAP.L drawdown since its inception was -46.44%, which is greater than VPAC.L's maximum drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAP.L and VPAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAP.LVPAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.44%

-26.87%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-4.94%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.20%

-9.34%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-15.98%

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.14%

-1.48%

-23.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.39%

-4.54%

-14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

1.90%

+3.54%

Volatility

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that MSAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAP.LVPAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

1.91%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

5.14%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

6.72%

+7.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

8.70%

+6.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

12.35%

+7.97%

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSAP.L and VPAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MSAP.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAP.L nor VPAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAP.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSAP.L and VPAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MSAP.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAP.L and VPAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer