MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L
MSAP.L (Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - MSAP.L tracks the Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF while FWRA.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSAP.L returned -1.62%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for FWRA.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSAP.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.
Performance
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSAP.L is traded in GBp, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSAP.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 10.60% return.
MSAP.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- -1.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSAP.L Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.41% | -12.17% | 1.88% | 3.99% |
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 10.60% | 13.69% | 20.10% | 9.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSAP.L and FWRA.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSAP.L
FWRA.L
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAP.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSAP.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 3.20 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 11.68 | -11.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSAP.L drawdown since its inception was -46.44%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAP.L and FWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSAP.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.44% | -17.88% | -28.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -6.94% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | -17.88% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.14% | -2.57% | -22.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.39% | -2.04% | -17.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 1.90% | +3.54% |
Volatility
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that MSAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSAP.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.33% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 10.05% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 12.38% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 13.05% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 13.05% | +7.27% |
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSAP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSAP.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSAP.L nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSAP.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAP.L.
MSAP.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAP.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for MSAP.L and FWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer