PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVL vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVL vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 121.03% return, which is significantly higher than CAT's 43.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed CAT with an annualized return of 33.34%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively lower 28.72% annualized return.


MRVL

1D
2.32%
1M
-31.04%
6M
137.84%
YTD
121.03%
1Y
133.87%
3Y*
42.13%
5Y*
25.86%
10Y*
33.34%
ALL TIME*
11.20%

CAT

1D
0.70%
1M
-17.66%
6M
24.42%
YTD
43.10%
1Y
87.70%
3Y*
43.33%
5Y*
33.84%
10Y*
28.72%
ALL TIME*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.66B$2.67B$2.93B
$4.42B$5.28B$10.40B

MRVL vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
121.03%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%65.74%-23.62%56.89%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
43.10%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%75.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and CAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2000

0.38

The correlation between MRVL and CAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRVL:

$164.26B

CAT:

$375.33B

EPS

MRVL:

$2.90

CAT:

$20.10

PE Ratio

MRVL:

64.76

CAT:

40.53

PEG Ratio

MRVL:

0.12

CAT:

2.68

PS Ratio

MRVL:

18.77

CAT:

5.40

PB Ratio

MRVL:

9.20

CAT:

20.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVL:

$8.72B

CAT:

$70.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.41B

CAT:

$23.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.27B

CAT:

$15.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVL vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MRVL vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRVLCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.34

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

13.81

-4.86

MRVL vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than CAT's maximum drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVLCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.60%

-73.43%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.35%

-26.36%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.79%

-34.05%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

-34.05%

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

-43.36%

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.71%

-23.34%

-17.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.63%

-19.71%

-26.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.14%

6.41%

+8.73%

Volatility

MRVL vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 27.33% compared to Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) at 11.37%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVLCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.33%

11.37%

+15.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.31%

31.53%

+33.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.92%

39.11%

+38.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.78%

31.62%

+32.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.85%

31.31%

+21.54%

Dividends

MRVL vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CAT's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.76%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.13%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

MRVL vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MRVL vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marvell Technology, Inc. and Caterpillar Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

CAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

CAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

CAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRVL and CAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to CAT (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVL and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer