MRUS vs. TRIP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Merus N.V. (MRUS) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP).

Performance

MRUS vs. TRIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Merus N.V. (MRUS) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MRUS vs. TRIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRUS Merus N.V.	0.00%	114.03%	52.91%	77.76%	-51.35%	81.40%	24.50%	0.57%	-27.84%	-8.10%
TRIP TripAdvisor, Inc.	-26.79%	-1.42%	-31.40%	19.74%	-34.04%	-5.28%	-5.27%	-36.67%	56.53%	-25.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MRUS : $6.81B TRIP : $1.24B
EPS MRUS : -$4.56 TRIP : $0.32
PS Ratio MRUS : 129.06 TRIP : 0.70
PB Ratio MRUS : 10.29 TRIP : 1.92
Total Revenue (TTM) MRUS : $51.17M TRIP : $1.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) MRUS : -$111.30M TRIP : $1.61B
EBITDA (TTM) MRUS : -$323.66M TRIP : $227.00M

Returns By Period

MRUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRIP

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: -26.79%
• 6M: -34.44%
• 1Y: -24.77%
• 3Y*: -18.73%
• 5Y*: -28.04%
• 10Y*: -15.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MRUS vs. TRIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIP

TRIP Risk / Return Rank: 24
TRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRUS vs. TRIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merus N.V. (MRUS) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRUS	TRIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.11	—

Correlation

The correlation between MRUS and TRIP is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MRUS vs. TRIP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRUS nor TRIP has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MRUS Merus N.V.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRIP TripAdvisor, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.52%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MRUS	TRIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-90.57%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-51.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-83.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-89.12%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.46%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MRUS	TRIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	58.78%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	51.54%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	52.14%	—

Financials