TRIP vs. MCK
TRIP (TripAdvisor, Inc.) and MCK (McKesson Corporation) are both stocks. TRIP operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical), while MCK operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TRIP returned -13.69%/yr vs 16.92%/yr for MCK. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRIP vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIP achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIP has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of -13.69%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.92% annualized return.
TRIP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- -12.62%
- 3Y*
- -8.32%
- 5Y*
- -17.89%
- 10Y*
- -13.69%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.24%
MCK
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 28.93%
- 5Y*
- 33.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $753.55M | $770.00M | $919.20M | |
| $33.97M | $38.81M | $45.38M |
TRIP vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIP TripAdvisor, Inc. | -2.71% | -1.42% | -31.40% | 19.74% | -34.04% | -5.28% | -5.27% | -36.67% | 56.53% | -25.68% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 4.58% | 44.54% | 23.67% | 24.13% | 51.82% | 44.23% | 27.06% | 26.72% | -28.40% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIP and MCK is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2011 | 0.18 |
The correlation between TRIP and MCK shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (3 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRIP:
$1.65B
MCK:
$100.24B
TRIP:
$0.16
MCK:
$38.53
TRIP:
90.22
MCK:
22.22
TRIP:
0.60
MCK:
0.30
TRIP:
0.89
MCK:
0.26
TRIP:
2.62
MCK:
15.19
TRIP:
$1.88B
MCK:
$403.43B
TRIP:
$1.24B
MCK:
$14.55B
TRIP:
$190.70M
MCK:
$6.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIP vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank
TRIP
MCK
TRIP vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRIP | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.18 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.89 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 1.94 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRIP vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIP drawdown since its inception was -90.57%, which is greater than MCK's maximum drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIP and MCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIP | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.57% | -82.84% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.72% | -27.17% | -24.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.65% | -27.17% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.65% | -27.17% | -48.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.86% | -43.71% | -41.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.55% | -13.92% | -71.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.26% | -28.60% | -25.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.49% | 12.38% | +19.11% |
Volatility
TRIP vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 10.05%. This indicates that TRIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIP | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 10.05% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.08% | 25.08% | +14.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.50% | 30.76% | +20.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.84% | 24.58% | +27.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.55% | 28.94% | +23.61% |
Dividends
TRIP vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
TRIP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
TRIP TripAdvisor, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRIP vs. MCK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TripAdvisor, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRIP vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison
TRIP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TripAdvisor, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 382.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MCK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.
TRIP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TripAdvisor, Inc. reported an operating income of -25.20M and revenue of 382.40M, resulting in an operating margin of -6.6%.
MCK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
TRIP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TripAdvisor, Inc. reported a net income of -32.40M and revenue of 382.40M, resulting in a net margin of -8.5%.
MCK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIP and MCK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRIP has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to MCK (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIP dropped -90.57% vs MCK's -82.84%.
MCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRIP and MCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer