MRFOX vs. FGCKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX).
MRFOX is managed by Marshfield. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015. FGCKX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 15, 2008.
Performance
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | -4.08% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | -6.85% | 18.67% | 37.30% | 47.35% | -33.82% | 22.62% | 67.61% | 38.50% | -4.07% | 36.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRFOX achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly higher than FGCKX's -6.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MRFOX has underperformed FGCKX with an annualized return of 15.18%, while FGCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.
MRFOX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- -4.08%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
FGCKX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FGCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MRFOX vs. FGCKX — Risk / Return Rank
MRFOX
FGCKX
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRFOX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 1.07 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 1.59 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 1.49 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 5.54 | -4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRFOX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.07 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.07 | 0.86 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.65 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between MRFOX and FGCKX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Dividend Comparison
MRFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.69% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.80% | 3.81% | 7.16% | 10.63% | 8.83% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.20% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRFOX drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, smaller than the maximum FGCKX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRFOX and FGCKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRFOX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.10% | -51.01% | +21.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -13.09% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.98% | -40.21% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -40.21% | +11.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -12.55% | +6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -9.03% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.88% | -1.13% |
Volatility
MRFOX vs. FGCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) is 2.74%, while Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that MRFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MRFOX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 6.73% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.00% | 14.66% | -7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 24.33% | -12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 23.99% | -11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 23.34% | -9.05% |