MRAL vs. BITI
MRAL (GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRAL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MARA Holdings Inc. (MARA), while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MRAL returned -76.80% vs 56.28% for BITI. Their -0.65 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MRAL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
MRAL vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a -8.52% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.
MRAL
- 1D
- -8.96%
- 1M
- -24.24%
- 6M
- -13.43%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 1Y
- -76.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.71%
BITI
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 25.22%
- 1Y
- 56.28%
- 3Y*
- -32.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.18M | $25.87M | $38.72M | |
| $4.23M | $5.15M | $7.61M |
MRAL vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF | -8.52% | -82.23% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 25.22% | -5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAL and BITI is -0.63, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | -0.65 |
The correlation between MRAL and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAL vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
MRAL
BITI
MRAL vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRAL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.22 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.24 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 5.45 | -6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRAL vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, roughly equal to the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.46% | -92.16% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.46% | -25.28% | -68.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.95% | -86.33% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.89% | -68.61% | +9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.78% | 10.37% | +61.41% |
Volatility
MRAL vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 60.92% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 8.93%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 60.92% | 8.93% | +51.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 127.55% | 33.35% | +94.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 162.66% | 44.25% | +118.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.33% | 52.01% | +115.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.33% | 52.01% | +115.32% |
MRAL vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRAL vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
MRAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 21.80% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAL and BITI have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRAL has higher volatility (60.92%) compared to BITI (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 56.28% vs -76.80% for MRAL. On fees, BITI is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 56.28% return vs -76.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITI is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 0.00% for MRAL.
MRAL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. MRAL tracks MARA Holdings Inc. (MARA), while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAL and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer