MQQQ vs. TSMG
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MQQQ is passively managed, while TSMG is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 83.05% vs 327.45% for TSMG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 94.33% return.
MQQQ
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 35.46%
- 1Y
- 83.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- 23.80%
- YTD
- 94.33%
- 6M
- 108.01%
- 1Y
- 327.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 39.32% | 35.43% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 94.33% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and TSMG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.67 |
The correlation between MQQQ and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
TSMG
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQQQ | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 4.61 | -2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 3.97 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.48 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 9.46 | -6.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 30.96 | -18.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQQQ | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 4.61 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.79 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -63.67% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -35.29% | +10.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -17.02% | +9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 10.79% | -3.79% |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 22.57%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 22.57% | -14.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.50% | 54.92% | -30.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.19% | 71.57% | -39.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 81.08% | -37.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 81.08% | -37.82% |
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than TSMG's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.45% | 2.02% | 0.02% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.91% | 11.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MQQQ and TSMG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMG has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 327.45% vs 83.05% for MQQQ. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 327.45% return vs 83.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer