MQQQ vs. NVDS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 62.78% vs -47.95% for NVDS. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for NVDS.

Performance

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -18.53% return.

MQQQ

• 1D: -6.32%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 27.22%
• 6M: 23.93%
• 1Y: 62.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDS

• 1D: 6.24%
• 1M: 8.67%
• YTD: -18.53%
• 6M: -16.59%
• 1Y: -47.95%
• 3Y*: -62.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	27.22%	31.67%	16.76%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	-18.53%	-58.18%	-22.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and NVDS is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024	-0.70

The correlation between MQQQ and NVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ

MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 52
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

NVDS

NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MQQQ	NVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	-0.90	+2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	-1.31	+3.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.85	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	-0.85	+3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.74	-1.41	+10.15

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the NVDS Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and NVDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and NVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MQQQ	NVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.16%	-99.40%	+57.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.23%	-56.48%	+31.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-95.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.68%	-99.25%	+90.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.16%	-83.59%	+76.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	36.37%	-29.17%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 17.78%, while Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a volatility of 20.03%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MQQQ	NVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.78%	20.03%	-2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.02%	40.67%	-11.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.95%	53.16%	-17.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.41%	68.89%	-24.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.41%	68.89%	-24.48%

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDS's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MQQQ vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than NVDS's 17.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	1.58%	2.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	17.42%	14.19%	14.11%	14.69%	5.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MQQQ and NVDS in my portfolio?

MQQQ and NVDS have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MQQQ or NVDS?

NVDS has higher volatility (20.03%) compared to MQQQ (17.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs NVDS's -99.40%.

Which ETF is better, MQQQ or NVDS?

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 62.78% vs -47.95% for NVDS. On fees, NVDS is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 17.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MQQQ or NVDS?

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 62.78% return vs -47.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MQQQ or NVDS?

NVDS is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MQQQ or NVDS?

NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 17.42%, compared with 1.58% for MQQQ.

What is the main difference between MQQQ and NVDS?

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDS is Inverse Equities. MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 1.15% for NVDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.