PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQLFX vs. SWSBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQLFX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than SWSBX's 0.34% return.


MQLFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
2.26%

SWSBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MQLFX
MFS Limited Maturity Fund
0.85%5.71%4.44%5.30%-4.69%-0.20%4.20%4.74%1.17%1.00%
SWSBX
Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.34%6.06%3.42%3.95%-5.89%-1.28%4.47%4.96%1.34%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MQLFX and SWSBX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017

0.73

The correlation between MQLFX and SWSBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQLFX vs. SWSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQLFX
MQLFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MQLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MQLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SWSBX
SWSBX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SWSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX) and Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQLFXSWSBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.64

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

2.77

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.37

+0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.73

7.75

+3.98

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SWSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQLFX and SWSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQLFXSWSBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.64

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.44

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.77

+0.77

Drawdowns

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQLFX drawdown since its inception was -7.14%, smaller than the maximum SWSBX drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQLFX and SWSBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQLFXSWSBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-9.06%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-1.54%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

-1.79%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.14%

-9.06%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.63%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-1.79%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.47%

-0.12%

Volatility

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Limited Maturity Fund (MQLFX) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) at 0.70%. This indicates that MQLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQLFXSWSBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.70%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

1.62%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

2.23%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.40%

2.99%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.17%

2.47%

-0.30%

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQLFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSBX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQLFX vs. SWSBX - Dividend Comparison

MQLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than SWSBX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MQLFX
MFS Limited Maturity Fund
4.33%4.34%3.47%2.85%1.38%1.46%2.27%2.60%2.18%1.61%1.27%1.24%
SWSBX
Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund
4.13%4.09%3.66%2.36%1.11%0.97%1.82%2.41%2.12%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQLFX and SWSBX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQLFX has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to SWSBX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQLFX dropped -7.14% vs SWSBX's -9.06%.

MQLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQLFX and SWSBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer