PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQIFX vs. PFADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQIFX achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly higher than PFADX's 2.46% return.


MQIFX

1D
0.64%
1M
1.22%
6M
5.19%
YTD
8.94%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
5.82%
ALL TIME*
9.29%

PFADX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.40%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MQIFX
Franklin Mutual Quest Fund
8.94%17.66%8.84%10.46%-6.85%11.50%-1.84%12.40%-7.33%0.06%
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.46%7.07%2.13%3.69%-9.50%3.85%7.25%8.16%-5.20%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MQIFX and PFADX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017

0.54

The correlation between MQIFX and PFADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQIFX vs. PFADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MQIFX
MQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
MQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PFADX
PFADX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PFADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFADX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFADX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQIFXPFADXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.80

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

5.21

+1.83

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the PFADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQIFX and PFADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQIFX drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, which is greater than PFADX's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQIFX and PFADX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQIFXPFADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-16.64%

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-3.63%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.71%

-6.38%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.91%

-16.64%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.87%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.86%

-5.23%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.25%

+1.21%

Volatility

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) at 1.16%. This indicates that MQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQIFXPFADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

1.16%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

3.64%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.96%

4.43%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

5.88%

+5.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.94%

5.52%

+6.42%

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQIFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PFADX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQIFX vs. PFADX - Dividend Comparison

MQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than PFADX's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MQIFX
Franklin Mutual Quest Fund
3.84%4.18%5.10%4.60%3.80%2.59%3.66%3.52%13.76%4.53%1.24%5.75%
PFADX
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund
2.40%2.46%2.89%1.04%5.33%3.46%0.08%1.51%0.91%0.52%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQIFX and PFADX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQIFX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to PFADX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQIFX dropped -34.60% vs PFADX's -16.64%.

MQIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQIFX and PFADX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer