PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQGIX vs. TIVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International Growth Fund Class I (MQGIX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQGIX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 22.18% return. Over the past 10 years, MQGIX has outperformed TIVFX with an annualized return of 9.41%, while TIVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


MQGIX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-0.44%
6M
-4.16%
YTD
0.15%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
10.13%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
9.41%
ALL TIME*
7.64%

TIVFX

1D
-0.94%
1M
-8.79%
6M
9.51%
YTD
22.18%
1Y
36.67%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
8.55%
ALL TIME*
6.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MQGIX
MFS International Growth Fund Class I
0.15%21.04%9.08%14.85%-15.11%9.48%15.73%27.20%-8.86%32.44%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
22.18%36.15%3.73%15.43%-20.57%7.53%12.61%19.38%-19.87%24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MQGIX and TIVFX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996

0.78

The correlation between MQGIX and TIVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQGIX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQGIX
MQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TIVFX
TIVFX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TIVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TIVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International Growth Fund Class I (MQGIX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQGIXTIVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.30

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

2.63

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

8.73

-8.11

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the TIVFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQGIX and TIVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.07%, roughly equal to the maximum TIVFX drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQGIX and TIVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQGIXTIVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.07%

-54.21%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-14.10%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-23.99%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.06%

-36.31%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.06%

-41.51%

+11.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.47%

-13.02%

+6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-13.35%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

4.24%

-0.15%

Volatility

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International Growth Fund Class I (MQGIX) is 3.49%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that MQGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQGIXTIVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

7.61%

-4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

18.87%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.21%

21.69%

-7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

19.25%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

17.76%

-2.24%

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQGIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQGIX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison

MQGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than TIVFX's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MQGIX
MFS International Growth Fund Class I
4.80%4.80%5.44%2.44%2.58%6.07%0.65%1.32%3.67%2.25%1.18%1.03%
TIVFX
American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund
7.22%8.82%10.23%1.66%1.39%3.65%0.34%1.69%1.37%1.28%1.57%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQGIX and TIVFX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIVFX has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to MQGIX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQGIX dropped -55.07% vs TIVFX's -54.21%.

TIVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQGIX and TIVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer