PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQ vs. PAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MQ vs. PAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQ achieves a -19.37% return, which is significantly lower than PAGS's -3.85% return.


MQ

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
-19.37%
6M
-22.47%
1Y
-30.49%
3Y*
-8.87%
5Y*
-34.39%
10Y*

PAGS

1D
0.22%
1M
3.82%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-9.66%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
-2.35%
5Y*
-28.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQ vs. PAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.
-19.37%25.33%-45.70%14.24%-64.41%-47.17%
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
-3.85%60.75%-49.80%42.68%-66.67%-49.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MQ and PAGS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.48

The correlation between MQ and PAGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MQ:

$1.66B

PAGS:

$2.53B

EPS

MQ:

$0.00

PAGS:

R$7.31

PE Ratio

MQ:

797.24

PAGS:

6.25

PS Ratio

MQ:

2.65

PAGS:

0.67

PB Ratio

MQ:

2.24

PAGS:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

MQ:

$651.61M

PAGS:

R$19.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MQ:

$456.19M

PAGS:

R$10.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

MQ:

$24.62M

PAGS:

R$9.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQ vs. PAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQ
MQ Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PAGS
PAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQ vs. PAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQPAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.08

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

0.43

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

0.90

-1.90

MQ vs. PAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the PAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQ and PAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQ vs. PAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQ drawdown since its inception was -89.71%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGS drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQ and PAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQPAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.71%

-90.00%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.66%

-27.21%

-17.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.34%

-57.60%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.71%

-89.84%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.48%

-84.37%

-4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-55.47%

-19.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.68%

13.03%

+17.65%

Volatility

MQ vs. PAGS - Volatility Comparison

Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) has a higher volatility of 15.42% compared to PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) at 11.85%. This indicates that MQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQPAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.42%

11.85%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.25%

33.74%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.58%

49.06%

-6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.79%

61.40%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.82%

61.08%

+3.74%

Dividends

MQ vs. PAGS - Dividend Comparison

MQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.


PositionTTM2025
MQ
Marqeta, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital Ltd.
6.92%3.94%

Financials

MQ vs. PAGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marqeta, Inc. and PagSeguro Digital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
165.80M
4.69B
(MQ) Total Revenue
(PAGS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MQ values in USD, PAGS values in BRL

MQ vs. PAGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marqeta, Inc. and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
70.9%
51.2%
Portfolio components
MQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.59M and revenue of 165.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

PAGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.40B and revenue of 4.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

MQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

PAGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

MQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

PAGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a net income of 535.32M and revenue of 4.69B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MQ and PAGS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQ has higher volatility (15.42%) compared to PAGS (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQ dropped -89.71% vs PAGS's -90.00%.

PAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQ and PAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer