MQ vs. NCNO
MQ (Marqeta, Inc.) and NCNO (nCino, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MQ in Software - Infrastructure, NCNO in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, MQ returned -6.87%/yr vs -14.43%/yr for NCNO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MQ vs. NCNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQ achieves a -19.58% return, which is significantly higher than NCNO's -41.34% return.
MQ
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -19.58%
- 6M
- -18.72%
- 1Y
- -30.16%
- 3Y*
- -6.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCNO
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -15.27%
- YTD
- -41.34%
- 6M
- -38.81%
- 1Y
- -44.95%
- 3Y*
- -14.43%
- 5Y*
- -24.49%
- 10Y*
- —
MQ vs. NCNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQ Marqeta, Inc. | -19.58% | 25.33% | -45.70% | 14.24% | -64.41% | -43.74% |
NCNO nCino, Inc. | -41.34% | -23.65% | -0.15% | 27.19% | -51.80% | -10.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQ and NCNO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MQ and NCNO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MQ:
$1.66B
NCNO:
$1.65B
MQ:
$0.00
NCNO:
$0.12
MQ:
795.16
NCNO:
129.20
MQ:
2.65
NCNO:
2.81
MQ:
2.23
NCNO:
1.70
MQ:
$651.61M
NCNO:
$610.06M
MQ:
$456.19M
NCNO:
$374.67M
MQ:
$24.62M
NCNO:
$49.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQ vs. NCNO — Risk / Return Rank
MQ
NCNO
MQ vs. NCNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) and nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQ | NCNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.83 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.79 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -1.38 | +0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQ | NCNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.98 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.49 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
MQ vs. NCNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQ drawdown since its inception was -89.71%, roughly equal to the maximum NCNO drawdown of -85.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQ and NCNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQ | NCNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.71% | -85.71% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.22% | -57.14% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.34% | -67.14% | +13.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.71% | -82.07% | -7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.51% | -84.66% | -3.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.17% | -59.10% | -16.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.18% | 32.59% | -2.41% |
Volatility
MQ vs. NCNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) is 14.84%, while nCino, Inc. (NCNO) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that MQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQ | NCNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.84% | 16.31% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.01% | 37.56% | -8.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.33% | 46.13% | -3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.84% | 53.41% | +11.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.84% | 54.23% | +10.61% |
Dividends
MQ vs. NCNO - Dividend Comparison
Neither MQ nor NCNO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MQ vs. NCNO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marqeta, Inc. and nCino, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MQ vs. NCNO - Profitability Comparison
MQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.59M and revenue of 165.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
NCNO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.94M and revenue of 159.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.
MQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
NCNO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.12M and revenue of 159.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
MQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
NCNO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nCino, Inc. reported a net income of 13.64M and revenue of 159.41M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MQ and NCNO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCNO has higher volatility (16.31%) compared to MQ (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQ dropped -89.71% vs NCNO's -85.71%.
MQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQ and NCNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer