PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPLY vs. DMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPLY vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monopoly ETF (MPLY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MPLY having a 5.37% return and DMAY slightly lower at 5.12%.


MPLY

1D
2.08%
1M
0.72%
6M
4.70%
YTD
5.37%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.83%

DMAY

1D
0.62%
1M
1.03%
6M
4.28%
YTD
5.12%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$397.29K$467.24K$1.84M
$232.41K$202.33K$174.94K

MPLY vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MPLY
Monopoly ETF
5.37%20.65%
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
5.12%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MPLY and DMAY is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025

0.87

The correlation between MPLY and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPLY vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPLY
MPLY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MPLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPLY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MPLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPLY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAY
DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPLY vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monopoly ETF (MPLY) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPLYDMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

3.13

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

15.85

-11.30

MPLY vs. DMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the DMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLY and DMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPLY vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPLY drawdown since its inception was -13.46%, roughly equal to the maximum DMAY drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLY and DMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPLYDMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.46%

-13.90%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-3.36%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

0.00%

-4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-2.20%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

0.66%

+3.45%

Volatility

MPLY vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison

Monopoly ETF (MPLY) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 1.97%. This indicates that MPLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPLYDMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

1.97%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

4.79%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

5.51%

+11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

9.11%

+6.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

8.41%

+7.61%

MPLY vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPLY vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison

MPLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
DMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%
MPLY
Monopoly ETF
0.12%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPLY and DMAY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPLY has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to DMAY (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPLY dropped -13.46% vs DMAY's -13.90%.

On 1-year performance, MPLY leads with 18.65% vs 10.40% for DMAY. On fees, MPLY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MPLY has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MPLY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

MPLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

MPLY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DMAY is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MPLY and 0.85% for DMAY.

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPLY and DMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer