PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPFDX vs. PRPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPFDX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than PRPIX's -1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MPFDX has underperformed PRPIX with an annualized return of 2.73%, while PRPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.87% annualized return.


MPFDX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.96%
6M
-1.38%
YTD
-0.83%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
2.73%
ALL TIME*
5.72%

PRPIX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-2.22%
6M
-1.21%
YTD
-1.21%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
2.87%
ALL TIME*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPFDX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio
-0.83%7.75%2.69%10.05%-16.28%-1.92%10.32%15.73%-3.87%6.91%
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
-1.21%9.21%6.49%12.72%-17.71%-0.76%7.87%15.77%-3.05%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MPFDX and PRPIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.85

The correlation between MPFDX and PRPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPFDX vs. PRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPFDX
MPFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MPFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MPFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPIX
PRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPFDXPRPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

0.89

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

2.99

-0.35

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the PRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPFDX and PRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPFDX drawdown since its inception was -25.17%, roughly equal to the maximum PRPIX drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPFDX and PRPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPFDXPRPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.17%

-24.24%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-3.29%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-5.67%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.81%

-24.24%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.17%

-24.24%

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-2.60%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-2.86%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.98%

+0.07%

Volatility

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) is 1.05%, while T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that MPFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPFDXPRPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.17%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.29%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

4.24%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

6.65%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.17%

6.06%

+0.11%

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPFDX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPIX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPFDX vs. PRPIX - Dividend Comparison

MPFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than PRPIX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPFDX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio
4.66%4.58%5.40%4.41%3.17%4.74%5.79%2.98%3.04%2.92%3.05%3.12%
PRPIX
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund
5.18%5.87%8.35%7.54%2.42%5.61%3.82%5.47%3.47%3.95%3.20%4.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPFDX and PRPIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPIX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to MPFDX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPFDX dropped -25.17% vs PRPIX's -24.24%.

PRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPFDX and PRPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer