PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPBAX vs. DINDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio (MPBAX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MPBAX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.11%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.44%

DINDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPBAX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio
7.39%17.66%7.48%14.29%-16.71%8.62%11.53%18.05%-6.31%16.67%
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
0.00%8.28%6.76%8.49%-7.06%0.01%5.10%9.59%-1.28%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MPBAX and DINDX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1997

0.22

The correlation between MPBAX and DINDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPBAX vs. DINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPBAX
MPBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MPBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DINDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio (MPBAX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPBAXDINDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPBAXDINDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Drawdowns

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPBAXDINDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

Volatility

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPBAXDINDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.63%

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPBAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DINDX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPBAX vs. DINDX - Dividend Comparison

MPBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, while DINDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.69%4.69%5.36%4.69%5.82%3.52%2.98%3.43%3.68%3.13%6.24%4.80%
MPBAX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio
6.31%6.77%2.70%0.00%0.61%7.91%1.32%1.74%14.65%6.52%1.15%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPBAX and DINDX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPBAX and DINDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer