MOSAX vs. LIAGX
MOSAX (MassMutual Overseas Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MOSAX returned 10.53%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOSAX charges 1.34%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOSAX achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 27.78% return.
MOSAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 10.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
LIAGX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 27.78%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 41.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOSAX MassMutual Overseas Fund | 2.57% | 25.48% | 0.12% | 18.26% | -15.35% | 1.05% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 27.78% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOSAX and LIAGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MOSAX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOSAX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
MOSAX
LIAGX
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MassMutual Overseas Fund (MOSAX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOSAX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.99 | -1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 2.71 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.82 | -1.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 11.32 | -8.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOSAX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.99 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.45 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOSAX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, which is greater than LIAGX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOSAX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOSAX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.43% | -37.87% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -14.56% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.43% | -17.11% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | 0.00% | -1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -13.24% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.62% | -0.20% |
Volatility
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MassMutual Overseas Fund (MOSAX) is 4.09%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that MOSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOSAX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 8.29% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 18.01% | -7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 20.68% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 18.79% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.79% | -0.58% |
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOSAX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOSAX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
MOSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.75%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOSAX MassMutual Overseas Fund | 17.75% | 18.21% | 6.02% | 2.24% | 9.26% | 9.64% | 1.78% | 5.10% | 12.16% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOSAX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to MOSAX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOSAX dropped -58.43% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOSAX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer