PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOJOX vs. CRTOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Opportunities Fund (CRTOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
15.26%22.91%22.29%19.10%-22.78%28.86%28.19%
CRTOX
Conquer Risk Tactical Opportunities Fund
1.00%11.98%8.39%15.76%-14.53%-2.00%19.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOJOX achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than CRTOX's 1.00% return.


MOJOX

1D
3.09%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
15.26%
6M
20.47%
1Y
45.54%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*

CRTOX

1D
4.43%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
1.00%
6M
2.50%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOJOX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTOX's 1.63% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MOJOX vs. CRTOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOJOX
MOJOX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MOJOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOJOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOJOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MOJOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOJOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CRTOX
CRTOX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CRTOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRTOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRTOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CRTOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRTOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) and Conquer Risk Tactical Opportunities Fund (CRTOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOJOXCRTOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

0.93

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

1.61

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

1.75

+2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.52

6.04

+11.48

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOJOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the CRTOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOJOX and CRTOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOJOXCRTOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

0.93

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.00

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.00

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between MOJOX and CRTOX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Dividend Comparison

MOJOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.27%, more than CRTOX's 12.17% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOJOX
Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund
23.27%26.83%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.49%5.78%4.75%
CRTOX
Conquer Risk Tactical Opportunities Fund
12.17%12.29%4.58%0.67%0.00%15.16%2.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOJOX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum CRTOX drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOJOX and CRTOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MOJOXCRTOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-98.92%

+70.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-10.49%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

-98.92%

+73.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.82%

-98.59%

+93.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-30.65%

+22.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.04%

-0.35%

Volatility

MOJOX vs. CRTOX - Volatility Comparison

Donoghue Forlines Momentum Fund (MOJOX) has a higher volatility of 9.31% compared to Conquer Risk Tactical Opportunities Fund (CRTOX) at 6.25%. This indicates that MOJOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MOJOXCRTOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.31%

6.25%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.25%

12.15%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

19.95%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

3,567.72%

-3,550.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

3,327.60%

-3,311.62%