MOD vs. HUT
MOD (Modine Manufacturing Company) and HUT (Hut 8 Corp.) are both stocks. MOD operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while HUT operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, MOD returned 64.42%/yr vs 35.40%/yr for HUT. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MOD vs. HUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOD achieves a 50.60% return, which is significantly lower than HUT's 134.28% return.
MOD
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -17.76%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 50.60%
- 1Y
- 49.42%
- 3Y*
- 74.15%
- 5Y*
- 64.42%
- 10Y*
- 35.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.30%
HUT
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 92.78%
- YTD
- 134.28%
- 1Y
- 406.97%
- 3Y*
- 85.18%
- 5Y*
- 35.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 23.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | $525.36M | $446.23M | $513.46M |
| $410.17M | $357.69M | $400.23M |
MOD vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOD Modine Manufacturing Company | 50.60% | 15.16% | 94.19% | 200.60% | 96.83% | -19.67% | 63.12% | -28.77% | -52.59% |
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 134.28% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -89.17% | 185.45% | 250.63% | -25.02% | -70.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOD and HUT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between MOD and HUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MOD:
$10.68B
HUT:
$12.12B
MOD:
$2.69
HUT:
-$2.77
MOD:
8.97
HUT:
8.66
MOD:
$3.37B
HUT:
-$40.96M
MOD:
$747.70M
HUT:
-$132.19M
MOD:
$282.10M
HUT:
-$306.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOD vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank
MOD
HUT
MOD vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOD | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 10.62 | -9.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 26.07 | -22.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOD vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOD drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOD and HUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOD | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -95.04% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.99% | -38.62% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.61% | -65.08% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.27% | -95.04% | +40.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.48% | -19.09% | -15.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.60% | -62.83% | +25.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 15.71% | -3.41% |
Volatility
MOD vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Modine Manufacturing Company (MOD) is 25.28%, while Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) has a volatility of 37.29%. This indicates that MOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOD | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.28% | 37.29% | -12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.33% | 76.96% | -24.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.06% | 107.84% | -36.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.40% | 105.81% | -44.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.36% | 114.67% | -55.31% |
Dividends
MOD vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison
Neither MOD nor HUT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MOD vs. HUT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Modine Manufacturing Company and Hut 8 Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MOD and HUT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUT has higher volatility (37.29%) compared to MOD (25.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOD dropped -97.53% vs HUT's -95.04%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOD and HUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer