PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. UJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than UJUN's 3.32% return.


MOAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
13.37%

UJUN

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.45%
YTD
3.32%
6M
4.16%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.94%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%23.60%
UJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June
3.32%10.63%12.49%12.17%-8.86%5.09%7.15%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and UJUN is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.80

The correlation between MOAT and UJUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. UJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
UJUN

Technology

32.8%
36.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.5%
4.9%

Healthcare

16.0%
8.4%

Industrials

13.5%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.1%

Financial Services

6.7%
11.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

MOAT
32.8%
UJUN
36.2%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
17.5%
UJUN
4.9%

Healthcare

MOAT
16.0%
UJUN
8.4%

Industrials

MOAT
13.5%
UJUN
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
10.3%
UJUN
10.1%

Financial Services

MOAT
6.7%
UJUN
11.9%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
UJUN
10.9%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.8%
UJUN
1.9%

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

UJUN
1.8%

Energy

MOAT

-

UJUN
3.5%

Utilities

MOAT

-

UJUN
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UJUN
UJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
UJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOATUJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.55

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.55

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

21.84

-18.06

MOAT vs. UJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the UJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and UJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOATUJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.40

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.77

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.77

0.00

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than UJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and UJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATUJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-13.73%

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-2.84%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-11.24%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-11.96%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-0.30%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-2.07%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

0.46%

+3.52%

Volatility

MOAT vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN) at 0.41%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATUJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

0.41%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

3.25%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.86%

4.25%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

8.32%

+9.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

8.77%

+9.91%

MOAT vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
UJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and UJUN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to UJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs UJUN's -13.73%.

On 5-year performance, MOAT leads with 8.01% vs 6.38% for UJUN. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, UJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 6.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.

MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while UJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.79% for UJUN.

UJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and UJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer