PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOAT vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

MOAT vs. REMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX).

MOAT and REMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. REMX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2010. Both MOAT and REMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MOAT vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOAT vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		-6.62%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		19.05%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 19.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed REMX with an annualized return of 13.48%, while REMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.

MOAT

1D
2.13%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
-6.62%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
13.48%

REMX

1D
2.95%
1M
-11.88%
YTD
19.05%
6M
36.14%
1Y
126.68%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with MOAT:
MOAT vs. SPYMOAT vs. VOOMOAT vs. BRK-AMOAT vs. SCHDMOAT vs. IVVMOAT vs. IOOMOAT vs. VTI
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

MOAT vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF

Return for Risk

MOAT vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOATREMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

2.65

-2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

3.08

-2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

5.10

-4.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

15.16

-11.79

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOAT vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and REMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOATREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

2.65

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.13

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.28

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

-0.10

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and REMX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MOAT vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than REMX's 1.48% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF		1.45%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF		1.48%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and REMX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

MOATREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-90.20%

+56.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-23.35%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-73.34%

+49.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-73.34%

+40.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-59.70%

+49.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-67.01%

+63.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

7.86%

-4.37%

Volatility

MOAT vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.81%, while VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 17.39%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

MOATREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

17.39%

-12.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

37.90%

-27.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

48.30%

-28.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

39.76%

-21.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

36.61%

-17.90%