MOAT vs. NRSH
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MOAT returned 14.97% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
MOAT vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.94% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 7.85% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and NRSH is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MOAT and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOAT vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
NRSH
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MOAT
NRSH
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
NRSH
-
Healthcare
MOAT
NRSH
-
Industrials
MOAT
NRSH
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
NRSH
-
Financial Services
MOAT
NRSH
-
Communication Services
MOAT
NRSH
-
Real Estate
MOAT
NRSH
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
NRSH
-
Energy
MOAT
-
NRSH
Utilities
MOAT
-
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
NRSH
MOAT vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOAT | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.40 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 5.40 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 16.86 | -13.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOAT | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.42 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.11 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -24.01% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -10.94% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | 0.00% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -5.62% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.50% | +0.48% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 3.82%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 9.21% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 20.27% | -10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 24.44% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 21.54% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 21.54% | -2.86% |
MOAT vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and NRSH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to MOAT (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 14.97% for MOAT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer