MOAT vs. INDA
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.47%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for INDA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
MOAT vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT has outperformed INDA with an annualized return of 13.47%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -10.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
MOAT vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and INDA is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between MOAT and INDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOAT vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
INDA
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MOAT
INDA
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
INDA
Healthcare
MOAT
INDA
Industrials
MOAT
INDA
Financial Services
MOAT
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
INDA
Communication Services
MOAT
INDA
Real Estate
MOAT
INDA
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
INDA
Energy
MOAT
-
INDA
Utilities
MOAT
-
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
INDA
MOAT vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.88 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.63 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | -1.46 | +4.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum INDA drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -45.07% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -18.69% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -22.72% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | -22.72% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -45.07% | +11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -17.77% | +13.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -9.59% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 8.09% | -4.03% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) have volatilities of 4.13% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.16% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 12.77% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 14.79% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 15.40% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 21.11% | -2.43% |
MOAT vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and INDA have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to MOAT (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs INDA's -45.07%.
On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.47% vs 7.09% for INDA. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.69% for INDA.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer