PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MOAT vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOAT vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-6.62%13.20%10.73%19.61%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
-3.06%30.93%17.07%14.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's -3.06% return.


MOAT

1D
2.13%
1M
-9.57%
YTD
-6.62%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
13.48%

BLCR

1D
3.51%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
2.52%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOAT vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOATBLCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

1.64

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

2.29

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.89

-2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

12.09

-8.72

MOAT vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and BLCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOATBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.64

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.40

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and BLCR is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MOAT vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.45%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.28%0.33%0.75%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BLCR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-21.29%

-12.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-12.13%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-7.11%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-2.28%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.90%

+0.59%

Volatility

MOAT vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is 4.81%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that MOAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MOATBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

7.06%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

12.45%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

21.12%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

17.59%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

17.59%

+1.12%